search 7500+ artists, their works, museums, movements, countries, time periods, media, specializations
<<< ART 09 Nov
ANY DAY ...IN ART ...IN HISTORY ||| HISTORY “4” NOV 10 ||| ALTERNATE SITES
ART 11 Nov >>>
ART “4” “2”-DAY  10 November
HENRY
TIME
surpic
4~2day
DEATHS: 1850 FRAGONARD — 1843 TRUMBULL
BIRTHS: 1697 HOGARTH — 1859 STEINLEN — 1847 BRIDGMAN
^ Born on 10 November 1697: William Hogarth, British painter and etcher who died on 26 October 1764.
— He played a crucial part in establishing an English school of painting, both through the quality of his painting and through campaigns to improve the status of the artist in England. He also demonstrated that artists could become independent of wealthy patrons by publishing engravings after their own paintings. He is best remembered for the satirical engravings that gave the name ‘Hogarthian’ to low-life scenes of the period.
—      William Hogarth is unquestionably one of the greatest English artists and a man of remarkably individual character and thought. He is the great innovator in English art. On one hand, he was the first to paint themes from Shakespeare, Milton and the theater, and the founder of a wholly original genre of moral history, which was long known as Hogarthian. On the other, he investigated the aesthetic principles of his art, which resulted in his book “The Analysis of Beauty”(1753).
      William Hogarth was the 5th child of Richard Hogarth, a schoolmaster and classical scholar from the north of England who had come to London in the mid-1680s. His father’s premature death in 1718 affected Hogarth’s early life, his training and forced him to earn money.
      In February 1714, Hogarth began his apprenticeship to a plate engraver, Ellis Gamble, who was a distant relation. By April 1720, he set up an independent business as an engraver. His first works included a number of commissions for small etched cards and bookplates, and in 1721 he produced two inventive engraved allegories. With these topical prints The South Sea Scheme and The Lottery, which aroused considerable attention, he started his black-and-white satires which made him so widely known in Britain and abroad. His first success as a painter was in the ‘conversational pieces’, in which figure informal groups of family and friends surrounded by customary things from their everyday life. He was not the inventor of the genre, and had many contemporary rivals, but his pictures are marked with his own individuality: The Fishing Party (1730), The Wedding of Stephen Bechingham and Mary Cox (1730). In 1729, he married a daughter of his painting teacher Sir James Thornhill. The scene from The Beggar’s Opera, the picture of an actual stage, brought him great success,  and at about about 1730, he was commissioned for several versions. The result of this accomplishment was the idea of his own ‘theater’: the creation of ‘pictorial dramas’ and reaching wider public through the means of engraving. The first successful series The Harlot’s Progress, of which only the engravings now exist (the originals were burnt in 1755), was immediately followed by the tremendous verve of The Rake’s Progress; the masterpiece of the story series The Marriage a la Mode followed, after an interval of twelve years. Hogarth’ satires were serious moral and social satires, besides being good paintings. In 1935, he opened his own academy in St. Martyn's Lane.
     In portraiture, Hogarth displays a great variety and originality: George Arnold (1740), Mary Edwards (1742), Bishop Benjamin Hoadly (1743). The charm of childhood, the ability to compose a vivid group, a delightful delicacy of color appear in The Graham Children (1742). The portrait heads of his servants are penetrating studies of character: Hogarth's Servants. (c.1750). The painting of Captain Thomas Coram (1740), the philanthropic sea captain who took a leading part in the foundation of the Foundling Hospital, adapts the formality of the ceremonial portrait to a democratic level. The painter’s character is reflected faithfully in his forthright Self-Portrait with Pug-Dog (1745). The quality of Hogarth as an artist is seen to advantage in his sketches and one sketch in particular, the famous The Shrimp Girl (1742) quickly executed with a limited range of color, stands alone in his work, taking its place among the masterpieces of the world in its harmony of form and content, its freshness and vitality. Hogarth died in 1764 in London and is buried in Chiswick cemetery.
— Hogarth satirized the follies of his age. He was born in London. On finishing his apprenticeship to a silversmith in 1718, he turned to engraving and first became known in 1726 for his illustrations for the novel Hudibras (1726), by Samuel Butler. Hogarth began painting about 1728, producing small group scenes such as A Musical Party (1730). By 1735 he had established a reputation as a painter of English manners and customs by two series of paintings, A Harlot's Progress (1732, destroyed by fire in 1755) and A Rake's Progress (1735). Through the sets of engravings he made from these paintings, Hogarth gained renown as a brilliant satirist of moral follies. Plagued by the artistic piracy to which his popular engravings were subject, he secured the passage of a copyright act, often called Hogarth's Act, in 1735.
      Two of Hogarth's most ambitious, although least characteristic, works are the murals The Good Samaritan and The Pool of Bethesda painted on the staircase of Saint Bartholomew's Hospital, London, from 1735 to 1736. These murals were executed in the so-called grand manner, a highly ornamental, baroque style depicting mythological subjects; it was popular in the French and Italian art of the period.
      In 1743 Hogarth completed the six paintings entitled Marriage à la Mode; in 1745 the engravings based on these paintings were published. Hogarth's remarkably exuberant satire of marriage for money, his pungent details of upper-class life, and his mastery of complex scenes find perhaps their highest expression in this series, generally considered his finest work. To this period also belong many of Hogarth's portraits. Among his exceptional portraits are the famous Garrick as Richard III (1745) and The Shrimp Girl (1759).
      In 1753 Hogarth wrote The Analysis of Beauty, a statement of his aesthetic principles. Four years later he was appointed sergeant painter to George II. During the last five years of his life, Hogarth was engaged in political feuds with the controversial British political reformer John Wilkes, whom he had satirized in an engraving. Wilkes retaliated with an attack on Hogarth's painting Sigismunda (1759). Hogarth's last engraving, The Bathos, intended as a farewell work, was published in 1764. He died in Chiswick. On his monument is an epitaph written by his friend, the actor David Garrick.
LINKS
Hogarth Painting the Comic Muse (1764 print, 37x34cm; 3/5 size; ZOOM to 6/5 size)
An Election Entertainment (1754, 100x127cm) _ The painting belongs to the series entitled An Election.
Soliciting Votes (1754, 102x127cm) _ This is the second of a series of four paintings executed by Hogarth on the moral of elections between 1753 and 1758.
An Election: 3. The Polling (1758 print 44x56cm; half-size; ZOOM to full size)
Marriage à la Mode 1: The Marriage Settlement (1743, 70x91cm) _ This is Scene 1 of the series of six . Controversial and quarrelsome, Hogarth is one of the most attractive and innovative British artists. Born in London, he trained as an engraver, later studying painting at a private academy, but was frustrated in his ambition to become an English 'history painter'. He blamed this on the vogue for Old Masters and competition from Continental contemporaries. His vociferous patriotism, however, cannot disguise his own indebtedness to French art; nor did he hesitate to advertise his use of 'the best Masters in Paris' to engrave the series Marriage à la Mode, of which this picture is the first. Since he could not earn a living as a portraitist or monumental painter, Hogarth conceived the notion of 'modern moral subjects' to be sold as engravings on subscription, as well as in their original painted state. In the spirit of the 'comic epics' of Henry Fielding, whom influenced and was later to influence him, these 'comic history paintings' are the works by which we best remember the artist and which most clearly express his own moral certitudes. They are related to sixteenth-century broadsheets, and to the 'conversation pieces' theatrical subjects which Hogarth himself helped to popularize.
      Marriage à la Mode, 'representing a Variety of Modern Occurrences in High-Life', was advertised for subscription in April 1743. The theme, an unhappy marriage between the daughter of a rich, miserly alderman merchant and the son of an impoverished earl, was suggested by current events but also indebted to Dryden's comedy of the same name, and by a recent play of Garricks. As the pictures were designed to be engraved — each print a mirror image of the composition incised on a copper plate — the sequence of events in every painting is reversed. The series thus begins with the proud Earl pointing to his family tree rooted in William the Conqueror; he rests his gouty foot — a sign of degeneracy — on a footstool decorated with his coronet. Behind him is a lavish building in the new classical style, unfinished for lack of money; a creditor is thrusting bills at him. But on the table in front of him is a pile of gold — the bride's dowry just handed him by the bespectacled alderman, who holds the marriage contract. Silvertongue, an ingratiating lawyer, whispers in the ear of the alderman's daughter listlessly twirling her wedding ring on a handkerchief. Turning away from her to take snuff and admire himself in the glass — and, in the engraving, to lead our eye into the next tableau — is the foppish bridegroom. At his feet, symbolic of the couple's plight, are a dog and a bitch chained to each other. From the walls horrid Italian Old Master martyrdoms presage tragedy, and a Gorgon's head screams from an oval frame above the pair. The rest of the series follows the pathetic adventures of the ill-assorted pair: he frequents a child prostitute and contracts venereal disease; she incurs debts in fashionable pursuits and takes Silvertongue as her lover. Discovered in a house of assignation, the lawyer kills the husband, is arrested and executed. The Countess, back in the alderman' mean house (where the 'low-life' paintings on the walls are Dutch, and the dog is starving) swallows poison; her father strips her wedding ring from her hand and a servant takes her weeping child, whose crippled leg in a brace recalls his tainted inheritance.
Marriage à la Mode 2: The Tête à Tête (1743, 70x91cm) _ aka Shortly after the Marriage.
The Orgy (1735, 62x75cm) _ This is scene III from the series of eight entitled A Rake's Progress. It represents a night at the Rose Tavern, Covent Garden, where an orgy is in preparation under the direction of Leathercoat, standing in the doorway. Tom Rakewell, incapably drunk, is robbed by the women of the establishment.
A Scene from the Beggar's Opera (1729) _ The Scene from the Beggar's Opera was among the first of Hogarth's topical pictures in a career that had begun with portraits and conversation pieces. Later he moved from the contemporary theatrical life to complete series of pictures of his own devising in subject: The Rake's Progress and Marriage à la Mode.
The Shrimp Girl (1740, 63x52cm) _ This spontaneous and fresh study recalls the style of Frans Hals and it can be considered a precursor of Impressionism.
The Strode Family (1738, 87x92cm) _ This is a fine example of the conversation pieces which Hogarth executed at the beginning of his career.
Gin Lane (1751, etching and line engraving, 36x34cm) _ Among the strong didactic pieces by Hogarth is Gin Lane, his graphic lecture on the evils of drinking gin. "Idleness, poverty, misery and distress, which drives even to madness and death" - this is the price one pays for indulgence in this poison. The companion print, Beer Street, encourages the use of this beverage, for, as Hogarth said, it is an "invigorating liquor" and on this street "all is joyous and thriving. Industry and jollity go hand in hand." No modern copywriter could produce a more persuasive argument. In most of Hogarth's plates one does not look for expert handling, for he used his craft to tell a story rather than to demonstrate a technical skill — which he did not, in fact, possess. We "read" his pictures. We must examine every section of the plate, as we would read every page of a book to know everything that happens. In the lower left-hand corner is the notorious gin cellar. Over the entrance is an inscription: Drunk for a Penny / Dead Drunk for Two Pence / Clean Straw for Nothing. On the lower right is a cadaverous itinerant ballad seller who also retails gin and obviously has imbibed more than he has sold. In the background, the buildings are empty or toppling — the area is rapidly becoming a slum. In one exposed room a man has hanged himself. In the right middle section there is some gaiety, some fighting, and much drinking. In front of a pawnshop on the other side of the square, a carpenter is trying to pledge his tools, a housewife her pots. Their receipts will, of course, go for gin. The most horrible scene is in the foreground, where a woman, breasts exposed and a drunken grin on her face, reaches for a pinch of snuff. She has lost her grip on her child, who falls over the railing to the pavement below. Hogarth's point is well made.
Moses Brought Before Pharaoh's Daughter (1746)
The Rake's ProgressThe Pool of Bethesda (1736; 675x1000pix, 103kb)
The Orgy (1735, 62x75cm) — The Fountaine Family (1730)
The Beggar's Opera 5 (1729) — The Wedding of Stephen Beckingham and Mary Cox (1730)
Scholars at a Lecture (1737 print, 22x18cm; full size)
Tailpiece, or The Bathos (1764 engraving, 32x34cm; 3/5 size; ZOOM to 6/5 size) ... or Manner of Sinking, in Sublime Paintings, inscribed to the Dealers in Dark Pictures. _ Rarely an artist's goodbye to the world has been that moving. Intended by the artist quite literally as a "tailpiece" to a bound collection of his printed works, this was also the last print he made. This conclusion to Hogarth's art includes a just-broken tobacco pipe and a cloud of smoke labelled "FINIS" within a gallery of other objects, all identifying death, destruction, the end, including his last will and testament naming Chaos as his executor, a broken column, one of his own prints going up in the flames of a candle, Phaeton's chariot descending from the sky, etc., etc. It is Hogarth' last graphic work, seven months before his death. Artistically a recourse to Salvator Rosa the title is based on Pope's poetical counterpart Peri Bathous or the Art of Sinking in Poetry (1727) as itself a parody of Longinus' Peri Hypsous. The final message ridicules the so-called academic school of painters, known to be pleased with allegories and compositions mixing up mythology of the ancient ages and newer conditions. The scenery itself is of an unheard of radicalism. Those attributes signaling the ending of the times are especially affected by the ruin: Scythe and hourglass are broken here as are crown, pipe, palette, bottle, bell, the sign of the pub "The Worlds End" with the burning globe as its insignia, the church, and several other symbols of Vanitas. The clock lost its hands, the trees are as dead as the hanged man – and Phoebus in the burning sky waggon together with his horses tumbling down to the bottomless abyss. Finally Saturn himself as god of time – the winged death – as of the wealth founded by agriculture breathes his last "Finis" while his last will – witnessed by the three Fates Clotho, Lachesis, Atropos – slips from his hand: All and every Atom there of to Chaos. Shortly "H. Nature Bankrupt". With the exception of the man in the thin crescent of the decreasing moon who still seems to be alive a bit. As also the gallows are standing fast. To increase the bathos a few puns have been mixed in the whole mess: a cobler's end and last resp., a rope's end, and the candle's end.
75 prints at Fine Arts Museums of SF
^ Died on 10 November 1850: Alexandre-Évariste Fragonard, French painter, sculptor, and draftsman, born on 26 October 1780, son of THE Jean-Honoré Fragonard [05 Apr 1732 – 22 Aug 1806] and Marie Anne Gérard.
     — Having been taught by his father and by David, he attracted notice at an early age and was considered the equal of Jean-Baptiste Isabey and of Hilaire Ledru [1769–1840] in his drawings. He made his début at the Salon of 1793 with Timoleon Sacrificing his Brother; later he exhibited genre subjects similar to those of J. A. Vallin [1760–>1831] and Jean-Baptiste Mallet, which were frequently reproduced in prints. During the Revolution he produced several allegories, such as La République Française. He made many drawings during the Consulate and the Empire; these are Neo-classical frieze compositions in which he made use of strongly contrasted lighting effects (e.g. The Child Pyrrhus at the Court of Glaucias, 1814).
      He developed an official career as sculptor and painter during the Empire. He took part in a competition for La Paix d'Amiens in 1801, after which he received several commissions. He sculpted the pediment of the Palais Bourbon in Paris (destroyed in the Revolution of 1830 and replaced by that of Jean-Pierre Cortot). Also for the Palais Bourbon, in 1810 he was commissioned to paint trompe-l’oeil grisailles to decorate the Salle des Gardes and the salon behind the peristyle (now destroyed, or hidden by the later false ceiling). In 1812 he was entrusted with the composition and execution of bas-reliefs for the obelisk that was to be built on the Pont Neuf, Paris, in memory of the Prussian campaign (not executed). His son Théophile Fragonard [1806–1876] also worked as a painter for Sèvres.
LINKS

Mirabeau devant Dreux-Brézé (1831; 1587x2363pix, 928kb) _ This reproduction looks like a fuzzy overenlargement of a small image. _ Le 25 septembre 1831, un concours est ouvert pour l'exécution des trois peintures historiques destinées à décorer la Chambre des députés au Palais Bourbon: la première représentant la scène du 23 juin 1789 à la fin de laquelle Mirabeau dit au Marquis de Dreux-Brézé : "allez dire à votre maître que nous sommes ici par la volonté du peuple, et que nous n'en sortirons que par la force des baïonnettes ", le second (image suivante) représentant l'invasion le 1° Prairial an III de la Convention présidée par Boissy d'Anglas, et le troisième: le Serment de Louis-Philippe à la charte constitutionnelle, le 9 août 1830. — Compare Mirabeau devant Dreux-Brézé (23 juin 1789) (1831) par Delacroix.
Boissy d'Anglas Salue la Tête du Député Féraud, à la Convention nationale, 20 mai 1795 (1831; 1910x2826pix, 1385kb) _ fuzzy reproduction (overenlarged?). _ Après la chute de Robespierre le 9 thermidor an II (27 juillet 1794), les sans-culottes qui n’avaient pourtant guère réagi pour le soutenir, sentirent très vite que la réaction thermidorienne allait à l’encontre de leurs intérêts. La liberté des prix retrouvée après la suppression de la loi du maximum général (4 nivôse an III, 24 decembre 1794) entraîna une flambée qui, ajoutée à de mauvaises récoltes et à un hiver très rigoureux, provoqua un sursaut des classes populaires acculées par la disette. Le spectre d’une insurrection réapparut au printemps 1795. Mais les journées du 12 germinal (01 Apr 1795) et du 1er prairial an III (20 May) n’aboutirent pas : les sans-culottes avaient perdu leurs chefs. Le 20 mai, les ouvriers affamés des faubourgs avaient envahi l’Assemblée et décapité le député Féraud qui tentait de s’interposer. Ils forcèrent François-Antoine Boissy d’Anglas [08 Dec 1756 – 20 Oct 1826], président de la Convention, à saluer la tête de son collègue portée au bout d’une pique. En restant imperturbable, le président avait évité que l’Assemblée ne cède à la pression en se dissolvant. Suite à cet événement, plusieurs députés montagnards nostalgiques de la Terreur robespierriste, Prieur de la Marne, Romme, Bouchotte, Soubrany, Duroy, et Duquesnoy, qui étaient restés assis en signe de solidarité avec les émeutiers, furent arrêtés et guillotinés.
     A travers les trois sujets du concours, il s’agissait d’inscrire le nouveau régime dans la tradition révolutionnaire, mais une révolution constitutionnelle, qualifiée depuis de « bourgeoise ». L’action de Mirabeau, noble en rupture de ban, marquait l’entrée de la bourgeoisie dans le gouvernement par un geste anti-absolutiste, mais non antiroyaliste: c’est la monarchie constitutionnelle qui était célébrée. Quant à la journée du 1er prairial, elle marquait la résistance de l’assemblée bourgeoise, fût-elle républicaine, face à toute dérive extrémiste, jacobine et ouvrière. La Terreur était soigneusement gommée du programme planifié par Guizot, et le dernier tableau devait apparaître comme l’aboutissement de cette révolution de liberté et d’ordre.
     Le concours de 1830 marquait une première étape vers la création du musée de Versailles. Souhaitant se présenter comme un aboutissement de toutes les tendances politiques, pourvu qu’elles fussent parlementaristes, Louis-Philippe cherchait dès cette époque à s’inscrire dans l’histoire de France, sans renier la Révolution à laquelle, jeune prince libéral, il avait participé en combattant à Jemappes. Mais le programme de 1830 était trop marqué politiquement pour pouvoir réellement aboutir : la réussite du musée de Versailles tient au fait que la Révolution se trouve intégrée, et comme noyée, dans l’histoire de la France.
     Jean-Auguste Tellier a participé au même concours: voici son Bd'ASlTdDFalCN20m1795 (1830, 85x110cm; 1065x1400pix, 275kb) ou . De même (1835, 460x612cm) Auguste Jean-Baptiste Vinchon [1789-1855], Delacroix, etc.
La Bataille de Marignane (1836; 2004x2629pix; 8995kb) _ clear reproduction, but the original painting has been damaged by being folded leaving a deep crease top to bottom, one side of which, in the reproduction, shows obtrusively the reflection of the photographer's lights.
Le Magicien (61x72cm)
^ Born on 10 November 1859: Théophile Alexandre Steinlen, Swiss-born French Art Nouveau illustrator, printmaker, painter, and sculptor, specialized in cats. He died on 14 (13?) December 1923.
_ Almost throughout his entire career Steinlen lived in Boulevard Montmartre praising Paris and the everyday life of its people with their sorrows and joys. Steinlen's artistic idiom is so expressive that his works attract people at first sight, the more so because many of his drawings were widespread in lithographs. After studying at the University at Lausanne and working as an apprentice designer in a textile factory in Mulhouse, Steinlen arrived in Paris in 1881 and quickly established himself in Montmartre, where he lived and worked for the rest of his life. In 1883 the illustrator Adolphe Willette introduced him to the avant-garde literary and artistic environment of Le Chat Noir cabaret which had been founded in 1881 by another Swiss expatriot, Rodolphe Salis. Steinlen soon became an illustrator of its satirical and humorous journal, Chat noir, and an artistic collaborator with writers such as Emile Zola, poets such as Jean Richepin, composers such as Paul Delmet, artists such as Toulouse-Lautrec and, most important, the singer and songwriter Aristide Bruant, all of whom he encountered at the Chat Noir. Bruant’s lyrics incorporate the argot of the poor, the worker, the rogue, the pimp, and the prostitute, for whom Steinlen’s empathy had been awakened on reading the novel L’Assommoir (1877) by Émile Zola [1840-1902]. Steinlen became the principal illustrator for Bruant’s journal Le Mirliton (1885–1896) and for the various books containing his songs and monologues, including the two volumes of Dans la rue (1888–1895). — The students of Steinlein included Jacob Steinhardt and Yakov Tugendkhol’d.
LINKS
Ball in Paris's Suburb (1892, 33x54cm; 560x912pix, 340kb)
The curious cat and the knitting work (gillotype 37x28cm; 2/3 size) _ 15 small images progress from the knitting alone, to the cat playing with the ball of yarn, to a bigger ball of yarn with the cat inside.
La Fillette Avalée par un Chat (gillotype 38x25cm; 4/5 size) _ In 14 progressive small pictures, a cute little girl, out for a walk, sees two birds, feeds them, catches them and puts them in a bag, then is seen by a black cat, who gradually becomes gigantic and then swallows her, all but her shoes and the bag, from which the birds escape.
Le Terme Franco-Russe (37x28cm; 2/3 size)
V'là l'choléra qu'arrive (1898; 575x471pix, 112kb)
La Grande Soeur (etching 23x17cm; 6/5 size) _ She is holding a baby and, next to her, there is a black... no, not cat, but dog!!!
L'Enfant malade (etching 37x30cm; 2/3 size)
250 prints at Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco (not all of cats)
^ Died on 10 November 1843: John Trumbull, son of colonial Connecticut governor, US painter, architect, and diplomat, specialized in Historical Subjects (US War of Independence), born on 06 June 1756. He studied under Benjamin West.
      Trumbull's importance lies in his historical paintings memorializing events in the US War of Independence. Applying Benjamin West’s and John Singleton Copley’s realistic innovations in history painting to US subjects, he created a series of images, reproduced in countless illustrations, that have become icons of US nationalism. They are also symbolic of his lifelong political and artistic identity.

— Born in Lebanon Connecticut, John Trumbull was the son of Jonathan Trumbull, the only colonial Royal Governor to embrace the Patriot cause. His mother was Faith Robinson, a descendant of Pilgrim leader John Robinson. He was also the first painter in the English American Colonies to have a college education, being a graduate of Harvard, entering the class of 1773 in the Junior Year at age fifteen.
      His father wanted him to pursue either the ministry or law, feeling that the manual crafts were beneath the family dignity, but once at Harvard, he lost no time making the acquaintance of John Singleton Copley, the leading portrait painter in the Colonies. After graduation, Trumbull taught school for a winter in Lebanon, but continued his study of painting, much to his fathers chagrin.
      At the outbreak of the War of Independence, Trumbull marched to Boston under the command of Gen. Joseph Spencer, as Adjutant of the 1st Connecticut Regiment. Stationed at Roxbury, he witnessed the Battle of Bunker Hill from there, which was the closest he ever came to any of the subjects of his great historical paintings. He came to the attention of General Washington by drawing a plan of the enemies works in front of the Patriot Army on Boston Neck, and was shortly thereafter appointed his Aide-de-Camp (General Order of 27 July 1775). In June of 1776, upon the assumption by General Gates of the command of the Army in the Northern Department, Trumbull was appointed his Adjutant. After service at Crown Point and Ticonderoga, he resigned on 22 February 1777, ostensibly because his commission as a Colonel was dated some three months later than his appointment to that rank by General Gates.
      Trumbull moved to Boston and hired as a studio the painting room built by artist John Smibert. He found still there several copies by him from celebrated pictures in Europe, which he found very useful.' With the exception of a short term of service as volunteer Aide-de-Camp to General Sullivan in Rhode Island, Trumbull remained in Boston until the autumn of 1779 when he determined to go to England to study under Benjamin West, one of the leading painters in Europe and official Painter of Historical Subjects to George III.
      Trumbull reached London in July of 1780 and presented to West a letter of introduction from Benjamin Franklin. He began work immediately, occupying a painting room with Gilbert Stuart, who was also a student under West at the time.
      Trumbull was arrested on 18 November l780, and threatened with hanging as an American spy, in retaliation for the hanging of Major Andre, the British spy who conspired with Benedict Arnold. He was incarcerated until June 1781, when West and Copley interceded with the king, and he was released upon condition that he leave the kingdom.
      Trumbull returned to London in 1784 to complete his studies under West and attend classes at the Royal Academy, and the influence of West can be clearly seen during this period. West himself desired to do a historical series on the US War of Independence, but feared loss of Royal Patronage, and Trumbull began to meditate seriously the subjects of national history, of events of the War of Independence, which became the great objects of his professional life. Trumbull's ambition, tempered as it was by Westas influence, finally crystallized into a determination to become the painter of the US War of Independence. Several of his historical paintings were begun and two finished in West's studio, including The Battle of Bunker Hill (1786).
     Trumbull met Thomas Jefferson in London in the summer of 1785. Upon his invitation Trumbull later visited Paris, and there submitted to him his two finished paintings The Battle of Bunker Hill and The Death of General Montgomery at Quebec. Both Jefferson and John Adams, then Minister to Great Britain, helped Trumbull to select ten additional events to be painted, of which Trumbull completed eight.
      The sketch for The Declaration of Independence was made at Jefferson's house in the Grille de Chaillot in 1786 with his information and advice. Returning to London, Trumbull completed the composition of The Declaration of Independence, The Surrender of Lord Cornwallis, The Battle of Trenton, and The Battle of Princeton while in West's studio. He left out the faces, however, intending to fill them in from life whenever possible. Thus, the face of John Adams was painted in London in the summer of 1787, Trumbull saying that just before Adams left the Court of St. James's he: "had the powder combed out of his hair. Its color and natural curl were beautiful, and I took that opportunity to paint his portrait in the small Declaration of Independence".
      In the autumn of 1787, Trumbull again visited Jefferson and there painted his portrait into the same canvas, and the portraits of the French officers in "The Surrender of Lord Cornwallis" "were painted from life in Mr. Jefferson's house." Apparently he also left certain details in the backgrounds to be finished later from sketches made on the spot.
      As Congress was to assemble in New York in December of 1789, Trumbull went there to pursue his work. He also hoped to sell engravings of his historical paintings, but that project failed. While there he had sittings from Washington, and likewise painted the portraits of many distinguished characters into several of the canvases, and later he traveled throughout the country on the same errand. In addition he painted many small portraits as pencil sketches or oil on mahogany to be used in the scenes determined upon but not yet designed. He also visited and sketched historic places so that he might become familiar with the actual setting of the events he was depicting.
      During these years (1789-1794) Trumbull lived, for the most part, in the new nation's capitol, New York City (some believe because Gilbert Stuart had taken up residence in Boston), supporting himself by painting portraits while seeking in vain to obtain the financial backing of the Government for his project. The portraits of this period, when Trumbull was fresh from six years' study abroad, at least three of which were passed under the instruction of West, are considered his best work and rank equally with examples of any US painter of the time. He is known for fluid brushstrokes and subtle glazes, and also produced a very few landscapes that anticipate the Hudson River School.
      Failing to obtain Government support, Trumbull accompanied John Jay to London in May 1794, and acted as his secretary while he was negotiating what became known as Jay's Treaty. In 1796 Trumbull was appointed one of the commissioners to carry out one of the Articles of that Treaty; and remained about eight years in London engaged in this work.
      Trumbull returned to New York in 1804 and sought to rebuild his practice as a portrait painter, but his ten years of foreign service, during which time he seldom exercised his talent, seem to have robbed his hand of much of its ability. Very few of the portraits of this period (1804-l808) evidence his earlier talent. Trumbull attributed his lack of success to the embargo placed by President Jefferson in the autumn of 1808 on all commerce, which he says threatened "the prosperity of those friends from whom I derived my subsistence," but it almost seems as if his genius had flared for a few brief years and then gone out forever, so marked is the division between the work of his youth and that of later life. In any event, he once more went abroad in 1809, and was stuck in England by the outbreak of the War of 1812, and forced to remain there until August of 1815.
      The Capitol in Washington DC having been partially destroyed by the British in 1814, Trumbull saw the opportunity in its restoration of realizing his ambition, and he applied for the commission to decorate the Rotunda with enlargements from his small originals. For this purpose several of the canvases were exhibited in the House of Representatives in 1816 and as a result a resolution passed both houses of the Congress to employ Trumbull to make four paintings: "Commemorative of the most important events of the American Revolution, to be placed, when finished, in the Capitol of the United States." Trumbull wrote to Jefferson on 26 December 1816: “The Declaration of Independence is finished — Trenton, Princeton, and York Town which were long since finished & engraved — I shall take them all with me to the Seat of Government. in a few days that I may not merely talk of what I will do but show what I have done.”
      The choice of the subjects and the size of the paintings, were left to the President. Trumbull tells of his interview with Madison, in which the President first suggested the Battle of Bunker Hill as one subject, but as only four of his paintings had been ordered, he recommended The Surrender of General Burgoyne, The Surrender of Lord Cornwallis, The Declaration of Independence, and The Resignation of Washington. These were finally selected by President Madison and Trumbull was engaged for the sum of $32'000 to enlarge them to a size of eighteen feet by twelve feet, with life-size figures.
      Trumbull first enlarged The Declaration of Independence and exhibited it during the years 1818-1820 in several cities. Public expectation was perhaps never raised so high respecting a picture, as in the case of this painting; and although the painter had only to copy his own beautiful original of former days, a disappointment was felt and loudly expressed. Faults which escaped detection in the miniature, were glaring when magnified — the tone and the coloring were not there — attitudes which appeared constrained in the original, were awkward in the copy — many of the likenesses had vanished." On 01 September 1818, John Quincy Adams wrote in his diary “Called about eleven o'clock at Mr. Trumbull's house, and saw his picture of the Declaration of Independence, which is now nearly finished. I cannot say I was disappointed in the execution of it, because my expectations were very low; . . . I think the old small picture far superior to this large new one.”
      The Surrender of Cornwallis was enlarged next and in turn was exhibited in New York, Boston and Baltimore in 1820.
      The Surrender of General Burgoyne' and The Resignation of Washington were enlarged from compositions painted at about this time, and the four enlargements were installed in the Rotunda of the Capitol in Washington under Trumbull's supervision in 1824.
      Trumbull was a first class painter in miniature. His small portraits are in oil paints on canvas or on wood, and his work in this field is excelled only by some of the miniatures by Malbone, and equalled only by the best work of Fraser and Trott. The pictures of the Battle of Trenton and Princeton, are among the most admirable miniatures in oil that ever were painted. The same may be said of the portraits in the small picture of the Surrender of Cornwallis. Some of Trumbull's life-size portraits done before 1794 (when he left painting for diplomacy) will stand the severest test, but when, however, in 1816, at the age of sixty, he undertook to enlarge his small originals, twenty by thirty inches, to a size twelve by eighteen feet, the result bears silent witness to the fact that he had had no training in this branch of art and for twenty years before he had been at best an unsuccessful painter.
      Trumbull lost the sight of one eye in childhood, and the concomitant lack of depth perception exaggerated by advancing age may, to some extent, explain the flat look of the enlargements.
      The importance of the canvases and miniatures lies in the fact that they are original portraits from life and are the work of Trumbull's early and brilliant youth and in a field in which he excelled, while the enlargements therefrom are the work of his declining years.
      Trumbull attempted in vain to induce the Government to commission him to fill the remaining panels of the Rotunda. and failing thus to sell his collection of Revolutionary portraits to the nation, his impaired health and failing powers brought him onto bad times, wherein at last he sought another way by which to use his early work to furnish support for his old age.
      Trumbull tells, in his Reminiscences, the pathetic story of how, when funds began to diminish, he was forced to sell "scraps of furniture, fragments of plate, etc.," and of how many pictures remained on his hands unsold, and to all appearance unsaleable. It occurred to him that although "the hope of a sale to the nation, or to a state, became more and more desperate from day to day," yet some private institution might be willing to possess the paintings, making payment therefor by a life annuity. He first considered his alma mater, Harvard, but finally chose Yale, as it was within his native state.
      Trumbull, throughout his life, appreciated the importance of his Revolutionary portraits and never wavered from the conviction that some day their great historic value would be recognized, and he believed that their exhibition would be a source of revenue to the College. The matter was suggested to the Trustees of Yale College by a friend, and a contract, dated 19 December 1831 was signed, by which Trumbull, in consideration of an annuity of $1000, in addition to the miniature portraits of persons distinguished during the Revolution, and certain copies of old masters, deeded to Yale: “Eight original paintings of subjects from the American Revolution, viz.,
1. The Battle of Bunker's Hill.
2. The Death of General Montgomery at Quebec.
3. The Declaration of Independence.
4. The Battle of Trenton.
5. The Battle of Princeton.
6. The Surrender of General Burgoyne.
7. The Surrender of Lord Cornwallis.
8. Washington resigning his Commission.”

Yale bound itself to erect a fireproof building for the reception of the paintings, of such form and dimensions as Trumbull should approve, and after the paintings were arranged that they should be exhibited and the profits first applied to the payment of the annuity, and all the profits after his death perpetually appropriated towards defraying the expenses of educating poor scholars in Yale College.
      Trumbull afterward supervized the building of the Trumbull Gallery, which stood upon the Yale Campus until the year 1901. He made, later, several additions, so that the Gallery in 1841, when he wrote his Reminiscences, contained, in addition to the miniatures: "fifty-five pictures by my own hand, painted at various periods, from my earliest essay of the Battle of Cannae, to my last composition, The Deluge, including the eight small original pictures of the American Revolution, which contain the portraits painted from life.”
      It is true that Trumbull chose to depict in The Battle of Bunker's Hill and in The Death of General Montgomery at Quebec, the success of the enemy, and in regard to Bunker Hill he is said to have adopted the British rather than the American account of the battle. At the same time, these canvases contain portraits from life painted by one of the first painters of the age, a man who had served in the War of Independence and who was familiar with the scenes of action. Trumbull in writing to Jefferson of his qualifications to paint the scenes of the Revolution, quite rightly stated that: "some superiority also arose from my having borne personally a humble part in the great events I was to describe. No one lives with me possessing this advantage, and no one can come after me to divide the honor of truth and authenticity, however easily I may hereafter be exceeded in elegance." (Letter to Jefferson, 11 June 1789).
      Nowhere else can be found likenesses of many of the actors in these scenes, and nowhere else can be found together so many original portraits of persons prominent in the US War of Independence. The Trumbull canvases and miniatures, containing about two hundred and fifty portraits, are the most important source of original information that exists on the likeness of these historical personages..
      The inscription over Trumbull's tomb on the Yale campus ends with these lines:
To his Country he gave his
SWORD and his PENCIL
  ^
—       Trumbull, an army officer and aide to George Washington during the War of Independence, painted, between 1819 and 1824, the first four of the eight paintings in the Rotunda of the United States Capitol. Trumbull's paintings treat episodes from the US Revolutionary period — two civil and two military:
1) Declaration of Independence in Congress, at the Independence Hall, Philadelphia, July 4th, 1776 (1819). It depicts a formative moment of the Revolution, although not the actual signing of the Declaration of Independence. Rather, it portrays the committee charged with drafting the Declaration reporting to the President of the Congress. Trumbull here affirms the central tenet of republicanism: the priority of select individuals working in concert for the greater good. The setting for the painting is formal and rational; authority rests in the balance achieved at the table, where the President of the Congress, John Hancock, offsets the writers of the Declaration--John Adams, Ben Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, and others. The Doric cornice of neo-classical architecture alludes to the classical republicanism the founding fathers sought to establish through both the Enlightenment and American revolutions.
2) Surrender of Lord Cornwallis at Yorktown, Virginia, October 19th, 1781. (1820) Balance continues, as does the rationalization and formal ritual emphasized in the Declaration. Unlike the Declaration, however, this painting revisits an acknowledged defeat, one which ended the war. The national decision depicted in the signing of the Declaration of Independence began formal hostilities: in Surrender of Lord Cornwallis these hostilities have passed, and order returns. Notice how the two sides create a rough parity between the armies and their equally dignified groups of flags, troop columns, and horses. Only General Lincoln's superior position on horseback, General George Washington backstage, and the rising smoke from the British side betray the victor. And even here the white horse of the victor harmonizes with the white flag of the vanquished to retain a respectful equanimity. This surrender concludes what Trumbull views as a gentleman's disagreement, a quarrel that has been gravely fought and honorably won.

3) The Surrender of Burgoyne at Saratoga, New York, October 17th, 1777 (1822) Dignified ritual and balance reign: the cannon to the right and the horse and rider on the left balance the painting around the fulcrum of the victorious Colonial general. This exaltation of the individual in a harmonious worldly setting--the only trace of battle here is the cannon in the foreground--sustains the gentlemanly deportment and respect of the first two paintings, and echoes the Enlightenment's view of man as central in the universe. General Gates comprises the axis of the painting; his democratic views are valorized. As he hospitably accepts Burgoyne's sword, both officers tacitly admit the superiority of the Colonial position. Pictorially, Gates and Burgoyne are matched so that the shift in status is minimal. Humanism and republicanism, not god and monarchy, rule the day. As in Cornwallis at Yorktown, an epic conflict has occurred, but civilization remains secure.
     This painting represents General Burgoyne on 16 (17?) October 1777, attended by General Phillips, and followed by other officers, arriving at the field tent of General Gates with a number of the principal officers of the American army assembled nearby. The confluence of Fish Creek and the North River, where the British left their arms, is shown in the distance, near the head of Col. Scammell; the troops are indistinctly seen crossing the creek and the meadows, under the direction of Colonel (later Governor) Lewis, then quarter-master general, and advancing towards the foreground; they disappear behind the wood, which serves as a backdrop to the three principal figures; and again appear (grenadiers, without arms or accoutrements) under the left arm of General Gates. Officers on horseback, American, British, and German, precede the head of the column, and form an interesting cavalcade, following the two dismounted generals, and connecting different parts of the picture. Trumbull planned this picture as early as 1786, as it is in the list agreed upon in conference with Jefferson and Adams, but in his proposals to publish engravings (New York, 02 April 1790) it is stated that it had not as yet been executed. Among Trumbulls effects was a finished sketch in outline and partly filled in with India ink, endorsed on the back by Trumbull "Surrender of General Burgoyne, Lebanon, August 1791". Another was a pencil sketch endorsed with the proportions of the figures. A third was an outline sketch in pencil of General Gates' tent, as it appears in the finished picture. A fourth was a finished sketch in sepia endorsed "Saratoga, scene from the rising ground nigh the church, on which was General Gates's marquee, Sep. 28, 1791, J. Trumbull." A fifth was a sketch in pencil endorsed "Maj. Gen. Gates New York Dec. 1790"; also a pencil portrait endorsed "B. Gen. Glover, Marblehead Nov. 13 1794" At Yale University, one can find the following miniature portraits endorsed on the back by Trumbull with the name and date when painted and the words "Capture of General Burgoyne," evidently used in this painting:
Major William Lithgow (sketch 1791, 108kb) (he is the first one at the left edge of Saratoga, cropped out of the reproduction linked to above)
Capt. Thomas Youngs Seymour (1793; 675x553pix, 32kb) (he is on horseback, at the extreme left foreground, in Saratoga, his face cropped out of the reproduction linked to above)
— A cropped Saratoga was reproduced on a 2-cent US postage stamp issued on 03 August 1927.

4) General George Washington Resigning His commission to Congress as Commander in Chief of the Army at Annapolis, Maryland, December 23rd, 1783. (1824). In this, the greatest of the four paintings, Trumbull conjures a return to the civil obeisance which marked the Declaration. The Founding Father defers to the United States, the individual submits to the deliberative, and the executive power yields before Congress. The impetus for Washington's noble decision is present in the visitor's gallery, in his wife, Martha, and grandchildren, symbols of the family and private sphere. The gallery sits atop an Ionic capitol, signifying the classical origins of republicanism and the rational order on which democracy rests. Washington's willingness to resign, to give up his power to others in order that he might return home to a domestic life, speaks of his confidence in the capacity of the young nation to continue its democratic experiment.
     Two other paintings by Trumbull further explain his Rotunda works; these pictures reveal similar, even more explicitly rendered themes constitutive of Trumbull's republicanism:
5) The Death of General Warren at the Battle of Bunker Hill on 17 June 1775 (1786; 775x1200pix, 96kb). _ British officer Major Small prevents a grenadier from bayoneting the helpless Warren. The painting emphasizes the virtue of self-restraint, a trope common to each of Trumbull's four Rotunda paintings. Magnanimity, generosity, and the example of the beneficent, humble ruler all find expression here. These themes are recapitulated in Washington's Resigning. Jules David Prown writes that "the fundamental theme is humanitarianism and generosity, the bonds that unite humans, rather than the forces that set them at each other's throats.
6) The Death of General Montgomery in the Attack on Quebec (1786). Trumbull provides us with a similar analogy, this time in relation to the Declaration. Here three revolutionaries mark the death of General Montgomery, who is struck in a pose similar to that of the Pietà. This painting may have been based on Jacques-Louis David's The Oath of the Horatii (1785), in which three classical figures raise their arms to swear an oath of vengeance
     John Singleton Copley's The Death of the Earl of Chatham (1781), also probably influenced Trumbull's Quebec. Here Members of Parliament cradle the collapsed earl, amidst a "sea of legs" like that for which Representative John Randolph criticized the Declaration in 1828.
     Trumbull uses the same imagery of Horatii in Quebec, where the three revolutionaries raise their arms to the dying Montgomery, and in Declaration, where the drafting committee of Jefferson and others resemble this formation. Although in Declaration, Trumbull places it in the context of the legislature, where the focus of the painting is a dying man, that of the revolutionary soldier and leader. Following this analysis, if President John Hancock's table in the State House at Philadelphia in Declaration is equated to the Pietà of General Montgomery in Quebec, as well as to Copley's dying earl, the Declaration of Independence becomes equivalent to salvation and martyrdom as well as to its more traditional importance as a covenant.
       As Trumbull grew older, he became increasingly isolated from his younger contemporaries of the mid-century. Between the peace of 1783 and his death in 1843 two generations had arisen and Trumbull was, to the greater number of them, like one who lingered on the shores of time or had perchance returned from another world, like a Rip Van Winkle.
— Mather Brown and Charles Loring Elliott were students of Trumbull
^
LINKS
William Pinkney
Mrs. William Pinkney (Ann Maria Rodgers) (1800, 74x63cm) _ detail (head) — Mrs. Rufus (Mary Alsop) King (1800, 78x65cm) _ detail (head) — Philip Church (1784, 45x35cm) _ at age about 5 — George Washington (1780, 91x71cm; 866x650cm; 146kb)
The Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776 (1787-1820; 662x1000px, 111kb) _ Thirty-six of the original members of the original forty-seven members of the first Congress were painted from life, years after 1776. Trumbull spent a quarter of a century tracking down people and painting them from life.
Niagara Falls from below the Great Cascade on the British Side, 1808, (1808; 400x594pix, 74kb) _ John Trumbull and his wife spent a week at Niagara Falls in August of 1807. Trumbull returned in September of the following year and sketched the cataracts from below. His sketchbook now at Yale has eight drawings that were produced on these trips. Trumbull stayed on the British side and did not venture to the US side which was wilderness. The work above is based on a pencil drawing dated 13 September 1808 at 15:00.
Death of Montgomery (1786; 530x500pix) Trumbull painted this in West's studio in London where he was studying under West. General Richard Montgomery was an American Patriot General who was killed in late December 1775 during a futile American effort to take Quebec from the British. Aaron Burr, possibly the second best known American hero-turned-villain (after Benedict Arnold), attempted in vain to carry Montgomery's body from the field. If Trumbull had painted this death scene a decade or so later, before Burr shot Alexander Hamilton (1804) and was tried for treason (1807), perhaps he might have elevated Burr to Hero. For
      Burr's efforts to rescue Montgomery are related thus: “Grapeshot pouring into the imperfect light of the dawn mortally wounded Montgomery and two of his aides. The general's last words were to Burr. "We shall be in the fort in two minutes," he said even as "he recieved the grapeshot & fell in his arms." Of those in the front row, only Burr anda French guide remained alive, and Burr's earnest efforts to rally the men behind him and push on were countermanded by an order to retreat from the slain general's successor in command. Aaron's Princeton classmate, Samuel Spring, had come north as chaplain of the expedition. It is from Spring that we have the memorable story of Burr's final actions at Pres-de-ville that morning. As the other Americans fled before the pursuing Canadians, Aaron lingered behind in a futile effort to carry off the body of Montgomery and ensure it a proper burial. The minister's story, as told years later, had little Burr hoisting the general, a big man, to his shoulders, and then stumbling through deep snow for several yards before dropping his burden to avoid capture."
The Sortie Made by the Garrison of Gibraltar (1789, 180x272cm; 327x500pix, 50kb) _ This painting depicts the events of the night of 26 November 1781, when British troops, long besieged by Spanish forces at Gibraltar, made a sortie against the encroaching enemy batteries. The focal point of the painting is the tragic death of the Spanish officer Don Jose de Barboza. Abandoned by his fleeing troops, he charged the attacking column alone, fell mortally wounded, and, refusing all assistance, died near his post. Trumbull portrays him rejecting the aid of General George Elliott, commander of the British troops. This work, the largest and last of three versions of the subject that Trumbull painted between 1786 and 1789, demonstrates his ambition to solidify his reputation on the basis of the highly respected genre of history painting.
The Sortie from Gibraltar (1788, 51x76cm; 147x225pix, 16kb) _ Remembered today for his monumental painting The Declaration of Independence, on display in the US Capitol, Trumbull ambitiously recorded on canvas the major events of the US's founding. Connecticut-born and educated at Harvard, Trumbull served as General George Washington's aide-de-camp. In that position he acquired experiences that contributed to the vividness of his art. In 1786 he embarked on a series of paintings of the US War of Independence, to be reproduced in engravings. Because the painting of recent history (as opposed to the ancient past) was a relatively new undertaking, Trumbull's work drew mixed reactions. In 1784 Trumbull went to England in the hope of building a reputation there. Seeking a theme that would show the British in a positive light, he chose to depict the sortie at Gibraltar on the night of 26 November 1781, in which British forces overthrew a Spanish siege, set the Spanish military works ablaze, and mortally wounded their commander, Don José de Barboza. The British general George Augustus Elliott magnanimously offered Barboza sanctuary, but the Spaniard valiantly chose to die at the battle site abandoned by his men. The picture gains veracity from the delicate portraits of the British officers, which Trumbull made from life, and from his attention to the details of their regalia. The illumination of the scene by the bloody conflagration and the picture's dynamic composition-with the dying but defiant hero at the center, framed by frenzied action to the left and calm repose to the right-make this one of Trumbull's most successful paintings.
^ Born on 10 November 1847: Frederick Arthur Bridgman, US painter specialized in orientalism, who died in 1928.
— Frederick Arthur Bridgman, the foremost US Orientalist, moved in 1866 to Paris, where he studied at the École des Beaux Arts and under French Impressionist Jean-Léon Gérôme. His first solo exhibition was in New York City in 1881. He was appointed Chairman of the American Artists Jury for the Paris Universal Exposition in 1889.
— Frederick Bridgman was born in Alabama, the son of an itinerant doctor from Massachusetts. His father died when Frederick was only three years old and, sensing the north-south tensions prior to the Civil War, his mother decided to return with her two sons to Boston in the north. However they soon moved to New York where Frederick, already showing artistic talent, joined the American Banknote Company as an apprentice engraver. But in spite of his progress and the opportunities for rapid promotion, he preferred to dedicate his time to painting, taking evening drawing classes first at the Brooklyn Art Association, then at the National Academy of Design. It is recounted that he even rose at 4 o'clock every morning to paint before going to work.
      Bridgman's studies soon produced results and in 1865 and again in 1866 he exhibited works at the Brooklyn Art Association. Encouraged by his success he gave up his job and in 1866, with the sponsorship of a group of Brooklyn businessmen, set out for Paris. However he soon found himself in Pont-Avent, the small village in Brittany which was home to a US artists' colony under the charismatic leadership of Robert Wylie [1839-1877] who painted dramatic rural landscapes. He stayed there for two summers, thinking also of becoming a landscape painter like Wylie.
      In the autumn of 1866 Bridgman joined the atelier of Jean-Léon Gérôme in Paris. But entry was not easy since, officially, the ateliers of the École des Beaux-Arts were all full. His friend the painter Thomas Eakins went to great lengths pulling strings to enable entry of a group of American students, amongst whom were Eakins himself, Earl Shinn, the future Orientalist Harry Humphrey Moore, and Bridgman. He remained there for four years, spending his summers at Pont-Aven with Wylie.
      Bridgman was soon exhibiting at the Paris Salons and his A Provincial Circus had much success at the Salon of 1870, so much so that he then sent it to America for exhibition at the Brooklyn Art Association. At this time he also had one of his canvases engraved for reproduction in the journal Le Monde Illustré and began to sell some of his work to the dealer Goupil, Gérome's father-in-law.
      He spent the period of the Franco-Prussian War and the Paris Commune painting rural scenes in Pont-Aven and in Spain. The winter of 1872-3 he spent in Spain and North Africa accompanied by an unknown English painter friend. Starting first in Tangiers, which he found picturesque but was apalled by the poverty, they quickly moved on, first by boat to Oran, then by train to Algeria - a country he found more conducive. There they lodged at a hotel in Biskra whilst renting an atelier in the poor quarter. In the evenings they sampled the local nightlife and their afternoons they spent exploring the surrounding villages and oases on horseback. Here they found the local color they were looking for - the crowds in the markets, the belly-dancers, even witnessing a fencing duel between two soldiers of the Biskra regiment. While there Bridgman worked assiduously, returning to Paris in the spring of 1873 with numerous painted canvases, oil sketches, pencil and ink drawings, together with some costumes and accessories he had used in his atelier.
      The favourable response to his Algerian scenes in Paris led him to plan another visit to North Africa the following winter. Accompanying him this time was Charles Sprague Pearce, a student of Bonnat, whom he had met in the south of France the previous winter. Arriving in Cairo in December 1873, they worked in the city producing numerous sketches of the Islamic monuments, but also the street life, which was Bridgman's main inspiration. Then, encouraged by an enthusiastic English couple they had met at the opera, they set off to travel up the Nile, a journey lasting three-and-a-half months. They sailed as far as the Second Cataract and visited Abu-Simbel. Bridgman brought back to Paris over three hundred sketches and studies and yet more studio accessories.
      In Paris he rented an atelier in the same building as Pearce and another American, E H Blashfield. There he commenced painting several ambitious reconstructions of antique Egyptian life, seeming to have forgotten his original ambition of being a landscape artist of the Bretan or Algerian countryside! The first, The Mummy's Funeral, was exhibited at the Salon of 1877 and was remarkably successful, becoming an exhibition favourite. It was engraved, copied and finally bought by the proprietor of the New York Herald, James Gordon Bennett. His reputation then made, he married a young heiress from Boston, Florence Mott Baker.
      The peak of his career probably came with the mounting of a personal exhibition displaying over three hundred of his works at the American Art Gallery, the major innovation of this exhibition being the inclusion of a large number of his sketches besides the usual new paintings and prints of older works. His work was highly praised not only for the variety of subjects but also the fine quality of their execution, their frankness, fidelity, freshness and beauty. Following this success, Bridgman was elected a member of the National Academy of Design.
      In the winter of 1885-6, Bridgman returned to Algiers with his wife, not just to work but because of his wife's failing health (she was showing signs of a hereditary neurological illness) - the climate there was much kinder and life more peaceful. However he could also return to his favourite compositional subject - daily Algerian life. He lodged his wife and family at a hotel and obtained for himself the services of a guide, Belkassem, who found him a place to work in the Casbah. It was the tiny home of a widow called Baia who lived there with her seven year old daughter, Zohr. He worked from a shady corner of their terrace from which vantage point he could paint both domestic scenes and daily life on the street. He became a good friend of the family and carried on a correspondence with Baia long after his return to France.
      In 1888 Bridgman published a long fully illustrated account of his stay in Algiers in Harper's Monthly Magazine. It was taken from his larger, more complete publication of the same year entitled Winters in Algiers which also described his previous stays in the city and which was sumptuously illustrated with wood engravings of his drawings and paintings.
      The next decade was a period of uninterrupted success. He was honored with having five works displayed at the 1889 Universal Exhibition in Paris. The following year a personal exhibition, similar to that of 1881, of about 400 of his pictures took place at Fifth Avenue Galleries in New York. When it moved on to Chicago it contained less than a hundred of these works - evidence of significant sales, enabling him to significantly expand his Parisian home on the Boulevard Malesherbes. Its extravagant decor in classical and oriental style led the artist John Singer Sargent to say that it was one of the two sights worth visiting Paris to see; the other being the Eiffel tower!
      There he continued to paint even more exotic North African scenes. However, feeling a need for new subject matter, he later made an attempt at a symbolist style, even turning to society portraiture, and then, in the 1890's, returning to historical and biblical themes just like his mentor Gérôme. But non of this later work was as successful as his Orientalist compositions of the previous decade.
      In 1901 Bridgman's wife, Florence, finally succumbed to her lengthy illness and died. Three years after this he married again, at the age of 54, to Marthe Yaeger. The marriage was to be long and happy.
      After the First World War, his popularity declined and he moved out of Paris to Lyons-la-Forêt in Normandy where, although continuing to paint, he died in 1928 almost forgotten by his former admiring public.
      Along with his fellow-countryman Edwin Lord Weeks, Frederick Arthur Bridgman is considered to be one of the doyens of the US Orientalist school.
Bridgman in his studio (photo, 665x522pix, 160kb)

LINKS
The Procession of the Sacred Bull Anubis (111x70cm) — Cleopatra on the Terraces of Philae
Arab Women at the Town Wall (1925, 50x73cm) — An Egyptian Procession (1902, 84x160cm)
L'Armée du Pharaon Engloutie par la Mer Rouge (1900, 115x211cm)
Le Retour (1892, 62x47cm) — Spanish Lady (1887, 125x69cm)
Near The Kasbah (1881, 133x115cm)
La Jeune Mauresque, Campagne d'Alger (1880, 78x50.2cm)
The Reading Lesson (1880, 108x86cm) — Funérailles d'une Momie (1876, 113x232cm)
The Bathing Beauties (1872, 59x109cm)
Almeh Flirting with an Armenian Policeman, Cairo (55x46cm)
An Eastern Courtyard (43x59cm) — An Eastern Veranda (60x91cm)
Apollon Enlevant Cyrène (86x138cm) — At the Oasis (56x92cm)
Cleopatra's Barge (83x159cm) — Dolce Far Niente (50x60cm)
Harem Girl (74x61cm) — L'Indolence (98x113cm)
On the Coast Of Kabylie (74x125cm) — Reclining by a Stream (50x91cm)
The Harem Boats (100x150cm) — Women at the Cemetery, Algiers (101x152cm)
Women Drawing Water From The Nile (92x132cm) — A Street in Algeria
^
Died on a 10 November:


1922 José Villegas y Cordero, Spanish artist born on 24 August 1848.

1914 Peter Moran, US artist born on 04 March 1841. — Relative? of Edward Moran [1829-1901]?

1900 Ferdinand Mallitsch (or Malitsch), Austrian artist born on 07 March 1820.

1891 Charles Robertson, British artist born in 1844.

^ 1730 Gregorio Lazzarini, Venetian academic painter born in 1655. Son of a barber and brother of the painter Elisabetta Lazzarini [1662–1729], he was an accomplished painter of portraits, mythological and historical subjects. He was much patronized by the Venetian nobility, including the Labia, for whom he worked throughout the 1680s, and the Donà. He was trained first by the Genoese Francesco Rosa [–1687], then by Girolamo Forabosco and, finally, in the academy of Pietro della Vecchia. He is documented as working in Venice from 1687 to 1715, after which he retired to Villabona. He painted with the solidity of the Emilian Baroque, to which he added rich Venetian color, yet his work remained academic and occasionally almost Neo-classical in style. In 1691 he painted The Charity of Saint Lorenzo Giustiniani, a large, dramatic composition, in which the figures are rhythmically arranged against a theatrical architectural setting. In 1694 he was commissioned by the Venetian state to decorate the Arco Morosini in the Sala dello Scrutinio in the Doge’s Palace. His style developed very little: The Pool of Bethesda (1719) and two vast canvases of biblical subjects, Solomon Riding David’s Mule and The Coronation of Joash and the Death of Athaliah, are grandiose, multi-figured compositions that retain a clear, academic draftsmanship. His mythological works include Aeneas and Mezentius. He also made many paintings of scenes from Tasso’s Gerusalemme liberata. Lazzarini headed an important school and is best remembered for being the teacher of Giambattista Tiepolo and Gaspare Diziani. — Venus, Cupid, and Bacchus

^ 1691 (buried) Johan Werner the younger, German artist born in 1630, son of Johan Werner the elder [1600 – 10 Mar 1656], who, from 1637, was employed as court painter by Count Per Brahe the younger [1602–1680]. The son also worked for the Count as a portrait painter, sculptor, and master builder. He designed the small town hall (1675) of Gränna in Småland, a town founded by Brahe. As a sculptor in wood and as a painter, he cooperated with his father in the long-term project of interior decorations in the Brahe Church and in Läckö Castle for Magnus Gabriel De la Gardie. As figure sculptors, the Werners can best be judged from their Apostles and Angels made for the Brahe Church. Although awkward in stature, the figures now and then show surprisingly vivid and energetic faces on the verge of humorous caricature. As wall painters, the Werners were naively expressive, as evidenced in the rendering of the family tree in the Brahe Church. Finally, they seem to have been much occupied as copyists of Brahe family portraits and of portraits of Swedish kings and queens, most of which are lost. Possibly they painted original portraits from life too, but this is harder to prove. Johan Werner II may have been responsible for a rather large oil portrait of the governor of the province of Småland, Johan Björnsson Printz [1592–1663], in the parish church of Bottnaryd near Jönköping. It depicts an immensely obese man, seemingly in his late 50s or 60s, dressed in black and wearing armor: one hand is on the ivory knob of his stick while the other holds a plumaged hat. Body and dress are summarily, almost plainly, painted, but the broad, massive face conveys a calm, if watchful authority. It is a straightforward likeness without any trace of idealization. If this portrait really is an original by Werner, he was a skilful if somewhat crude portraitist, but Werner’s authorship is by no means secure. Although neither was a great artist, the two Werners were remarkable representatives of Swedish provincial art.

^
Born on a 10 November:


^ 1878 (14 Nov 1883?) Louis Casimir Ladislas “Marcoussis” (originally Markus), Polish French Cubist painter and printmaker who died on 22 October 1941. — Born in Warsaw, he came to Paris in 1903, changed name from Markus to Marcoussis, and was naturalized French. He died in Cusset (Dept. Allier) — The second son in a cultivated family of Jewish origin that had converted to Catholicism, he began studying law in Warsaw but left to enrol in the Academy of Fine Arts in Kraków. When he refused to follow decorative arts and design, potentially useful in the family’s carpet manufacturing business, his father cut off his allowance, reinstating it only after he won honours in drawing and decided to continue his studies in Paris. In 1903 he enrolled under Jules Lefebvre at the Académie Julian in Paris, where he became friendly with Roger de La Fresnaye and the French painter Robert Lotiron [1886–1966]. A casual student, he spent most of his time visiting the Louvre, salon exhibitions, galleries and cafés until 1905, when the subvention from home ended. The first work he exhibited in Paris was an Impressionist landscape at the Salon d’Automne in 1905. Now obliged to support himself, he took advantage of his facility as a draftsman and submitted illustrations to Parisian magazines of humor and fashion: Vie parisienne, Le Journal and Assiette au beurre. He continued to paint and by 1907 had moved into the orbit of Fauvism. A chance encounter with Guillaume Apollinaire and Georges Braque at the Cirque Médrano in 1910, by which time he was living in bourgeois comfort with Marcelle Humbert as a highly successful illustrator, changed the course of Marcoussis’s life. Presented to Picasso, Marcoussis was startled by Cubism; Picasso in turn was taken with Marcelle, whom he renamed Eva and swept off to Avignon, Ceret and Sorgues. Freed of the pressures of maintaining a middle-class apartment, Marcoussis began to associate with Apollinaire and other younger poets and to experiment with the new painting. At the urging of Apollinaire he changed his surname to that of a small village in the district of Essonne. Although he exhibited in the Section d’Or (1912, the year in which he etched Apollinaire’s portrait), his own brand of Cubism was closer to that of the Montmartre artists Picasso and Braque than to that of the Puteaux Group. Like the former he favored still-life and subjects that made reference to music, but his approach to form remained readable, his Cubist treatment more moderate. He gave up illustration only in 1913, the year in which he married the Polish painter Alicia Halicka; among his last caricatures is one lampooning Cubism. A typical example of his pre-war work is The Cellist (1914) — LINKSLa Table (1930, color etching, 25x18cm; 4/3 size) — Intérieur à la contrebasse (50x61cm)

1806 Franz August Schubert, German artist who died in 1893.

1785 or 1786 Karl-Gottfried-Traugott Faber, German artist who died on 25 July 1863.

1753 Jean-Antoine-Théodore Giroust, French artist who died on 19 July 1817.
TO THE TOP
PLEASE CLICK HERE TO WRITE TO ART “4” NOV
http://www.jcanu.hpg.ig.com.br/art/art4nov/art1110.html
http://members.xoom.virgilio.it/all42day/art/art4nov/art1110.html
http://www.safran-arts.com/42day/art/art4nov/art1110.html

updated Monday 10-Nov-2003 13:25 UT
safe site
site safe for children safe site